State v. Chun - Alcotest Litigation and Court Documents

By Evan Levow
 on 0101/0909/15151515
 in the category:
breath analyzer

The breath testing machine used in New Jersey DWI is the Draeger Alcotest® 7110 MKIII-C.

We own this machine.  We bought it because we wanted to know, as best as possible, how the machine functions, and to investigate errors in testing.  We utilize this information to fully defend our clients.

There is a case that litigated the scientific reliability and admissibility of this machine.  This case, State v. Chun, was argued before the New Jersey Supreme Court, resulting in a landmark decision that not only affected how breath testing occurs in New Jersey, but nationwide.  New Jersey is the first state to undergo a scientific reliability hearing on the Alcotest®.

Evan Levow, of Levow DWI Law, P.C., represented the lead defendant in the Chun case.

The litigation lasted over 3 years, with 20,000 documents.  The actual in court testimony and challenge of the machine lasted 41 days.  Over 8,300 pages of transcripts were produced, with 13 witnesses testifying, and over 400 exhibits introduced to the Court.

At issue is the admissibility of the breath testing results from the machine to prove intoxication against motorists in New Jersey.  Through extensive cross examination of the State’s witnesses and direct examination of the Defense witnesses, many issues have been set forth regarding the reliability and accuracy of the machine results.

Mr. Levow utilizes the information from State v. Chun to help his clients successfully resolve DWI cases.

Please call us to discuss how we can help you.

State v. Chun Litigation Documents

State v. Chun New Jersey Supreme - Court Opinion - March 17, 2008

Chun Source Code Hearing Report of the Special Master - November 14, 2007

State v. Foley Opinion

Order from State v. Foley

Florida Order Granting Intoxilyzer Sourcecoding

Initial Order from Judge Cantor dated 10/14/05

Defense Response to State's Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Appellate Division

Appendix to Response Brief to State's Motion for Leave to Appeal

Supreme Court Order of 12/14/05 Certifying Case to Supreme Court and naming Special Master

Supreme Court Order of 1/10/06 Admitting Alcotest Results During Pendency of Reliability Hearing

Motion for Reconsideration of 1/10/06 Order

Defense Brief in Support of Motion for Reconsideration of 1/10/06 Order

Judge King Discovery Order of 2/3/06

Motion for Funding of Experts

Letter Directing State not to Continue Roll Out of Machine and Order Regarding Expert Funding Motion

Supplemental Management and Discovery Order of March 17, 2006

Protective Order

Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration of 1/10/06 Sua Sponte Order

State v. Chun - Master's Report

Alcotest Report-Base One Technologies

Report of Thomas Workman, Esq., Defense Consultant

DSDI Static Code Review and Analysis Findings Report

Summary of Software House Findings for Source Code of Draeger Alcotest

Chun Defense Brief

Chun Defense Source Code Reliability Brief

(877) 735-2288
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Evan Levow - instructor of field sobrietyState V. Chun Button
(877) 735-2288
Evan Levow
Date Published: January 9, 2015
Evan Levow is the managing partner of Levow DWI Law, P.C., which is a Tier 1 DUI/DWI Best Law Firm. Evan Levow has argued before the New Jersey Supreme Court on landmark DWI breath testing cases such as State vs. Chun. He is also the President Emeritus of the 600 member DUI Defense Lawyers Association.
Home » State v. Chun - Alcotest Litigation and Court Documents
(856) 428-5055
A New Jersey DWI Law Firm.
1415 Marlton Pike East, #400
Cherry Hill, NJ 08034
Get Directions
"GO WITH EVAN! Evan got my DWI dropped completely. It still amazes me how he was able to do so, considering my personal circumstance. But if you are considering Levow DWI Law go with them."
Levow DWI Law, P.C. Reviewed by KL on Jan 6
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Rating: 5.0 ★★★★★
Copyright 2021 Levow DWI Law, P.C. This website is to be considered as attorney advertising. Use of this website does not form an attorney-client relationship. Our headquarters is in Cherry Hill, NJ. All other offices are by appointment only.
Awards methodologies